EPORA Checks for Public Facing & High Profile Individuals

Public facing individuals often maintain extensive online footprints that can impact audience trust, brand reputation and organisational decision making.

Incorporating EPORA Checks (Exposed Person Online Risk Assessment) into risk assessments allows organisations to better assess presenters, contributors, influencers, executives and other high profile individuals using structured, evidence based analysis of online information.

EPORA Checks for Public Facing & High Profile Individuals

Public facing individuals often maintain extensive online footprints that can impact audience trust, brand reputation and organisational decision making.
Through our EPORA Check (Exposed Person Online Risk Assessment), organisations can assess presenters, contributors, influencers, executives and other high profile individuals using structured, evidence based analysis of online information.

Why EPORA Is Different

Unlike standard social media screening, EPORA combines adverse media intelligence, online association analysis and experienced analyst review supported by intelligent technology to deliver a more comprehensive assessment of reputational risk.

Human-Led Intelligence

Reviewed by experienced analysts who assess findings in context.

Evidence Based Reporting

Structured findings supported by source references and audit trails.

Reputation & Public Trust Focused

Helping protect audience confidence and organisational reputation.

Governance Ready

Supports governance, safeguarding, and compliance decisions. 

What our EPORA Checks Cover

Online information, media coverage and intelligence risk indicators that may present reputational, safeguarding or organisational concerns.

Identifies online content that may conflict with organisational values, safeguarding expectations, public trust requirements or audience expectations.

Findings may include harassment, discriminatory commentary, hostility, drug endorsement, intolerance, offensive conduct or other online indicators relevant to the agreed assessment scope.

Searches news sources, blogs, public commentary, media archives and open source intelligence sources to identify adverse publicity, controversies, investigations, allegations or issues that may affect public confidence or organisational reputation.

Where relevant content is identified, findings are supported by source references, URLs, screenshots and contextual information.

This helps ensure reports remain transparent, auditable and suitable for governance and decision making purposes.

Experienced analysts supported by intelligent technology assess findings in context.

Human review helps reduce false positives, avoids content being taken out of context and supports balanced and defensible reporting.

Findings are assessed against predefined frameworks designed to support clients make informed decisions.

Reports provide online risk intelligence that assist governance, safeguarding, reputational and public trust assessments without making suitability recommendations.

Reviews online associations, affiliations and connections.

Connections are assessed against open source intelligence sources, sanctions references, government published lists and other agreed intelligence frameworks where appropriate.

The resulting intelligence may provide additional context relevant to governance, safeguarding and reputational risk considerations.

Assesses online activity that may affect credibility, stakeholder confidence, audience perception or organisational reputation.

Reports are designed to support governance, compliance, safeguarding and risk management teams through documented findings, evidence references and auditable assessment outcomes.

What You’ll Receive

Clear categorisation of report findings presented through a structured assessment framework designed to support informed decision making.

Clear indicators that help organisations quickly understand whether relevant online information has been identified.

Contextual assessment of online associations and relationships where relevant to reputational and governance considerations.

Supporting evidence include source references, screenshots, URLs and contextual information designed to support transparency and auditability.
Every report is reviewed by experienced Social Intelligence Officers who objectively reviews findings in context and support proportionate understanding of online information.

Structured reporting designed to support governance, compliance, safeguarding, communications and board level decision making processes.

Exposed Person Specialists

Supporting expertise supporting informed decisions for high profile and public facing individuals.

Delivered in 1 – 2 Working Days

Efficient turnaround for recruitment teams.

Defensible Reporting

Clear, contextual and easy to understand findings.

Designed for High Profile Individuals

Designed for high risk public facing roles, TV and media.

Safer Recruitment Starts with Better Insight

Supporting organisations across the UK and internationally through locally adaptable methodologies, experienced analyst review and intelligent technology.

EPORA FAQs

Clear, compliant answers to help you make confident hiring decisions.

EPORA (Exposed Person Online Risk Assessment) is a specialist reputational intelligence assessment designed for individuals whose online presence, public profile or professional standing may influence public trust, organisational reputation or stakeholder confidence.

Using online information, EPORA identifies online indicators, adverse media exposure, high risk associations and other reputational considerations through evidence backed, human-led analysis.

EPORA reports provide structured, evidence based findings designed to support reputational assessment, governance and decision making.

Depending on the scope and findings, reports include:

  • Assessment outcomes
  • Insights and structured classification of risks
  • Contextual information
  • Supporting evidence and references where relevant

Organisations use EPORA when reputation matters.

Whether appointing a senior executive, engaging a contributor, selecting a spokesperson or onboarding a high profile individual, EPORA helps decision makers identify online information that could present reputational, safeguarding, governance or public trust concerns before decisions are made.

EPORA goes beyond automated social media searches.

Rather than relying solely on technology or keyword matching, assessments combine experienced analyst review, open-source intelligence and intelligent technology to provide context, reduce false positives and support balanced, defensible reporting.

The result is a more comprehensive report on reputation, public trust and organisational risk.

EPORA is designed for high risk individuals whose actions, profile or public visibility could create organisational, commercial or reputational exposure.

This includes presenters, journalists, influencers, senior executives, board members, trustees, public commentators, ambassadors, campaigners, regulated professionals and other individuals subject to public, stakeholder or media scrutiny.

EPORA assesses a broad range of online risk indicators.

Depending on the agreed scope, assessments identify indicators relating to:

  • Adverse media exposure
  • Harassment and bullying
  • Discrimination and intolerance
  • Fraud and financial misconduct
  • Illegal activity
  • Explicit content
  • Drug-related concerns
  • Extremist affiliations
  • High risk associations
  • Other reputational or governance concerns

All findings are reviewed in context and supported by evidence where relevant.

Yes. EPORA assesses online associations, affiliations and connections where relevant to the agreed scope.

Connections may be assessed against open source intelligence sources, sanctions references and other recognised intelligence frameworks where appropriate.

Understanding networks and associations often provides valuable context beyond individual posts or comments.

EPORA helps organisations identify online content, associations and adverse media that may create future reputational challenges, allowing concerns to be understood and reviewed before decisions are finalised.

Yes. EPORA provides structured, evidence-backed reporting that may support governance, compliance, safeguarding, communications and risk management teams.

Reports are intended to support informed and defensible decisions while maintaining transparency and accountability.

Because reputation is difficult to build and easy to damage.

EPORA helps organisations identify online information that could conflict with audience expectations, brand values, safeguarding responsibilities or stakeholder trust.

The assessment provides additional due diligence and supports more informed decisions when reputation is a critical consideration.

Context matters.

Online content can often be misunderstood when assessed purely through automation.

Experienced Social Intelligence Officers supported by intelligent technology help distinguish between genuine concerns, satire, historical content, quotations, reporting, commentary and other contextual factors that may affect judgement.

This supports more accurate, balanced and defensible outcomes.

Yes. Where relevant online content is identified, reports include supporting URLs, source references, screenshots and contextual information to help create a clear and auditable record of the assessment.

This supports governance, compliance, safeguarding and risk-management processes.

EPORA combines experienced analyst review with intelligent technology.

Findings are evaluated in context rather than generated solely through automated screening.

This helps reduce misinterpretation, avoids content being taken out of context and supports balanced, proportionate and evidence-based reporting.

No. EPORA reviews only information that can be lawfully accessed at the time of assessment.

Private accounts, password protected areas, deleted content, restricted content and information obtained through covert methods are not accessed or included.